23 Mar Why Stem Cell Therapy is So Controversial in California?
There is no denying that stem cell studies offer great promise in defining and understanding primary human development mechanisms. Researchers distinguish this advanced treatment from other medical procedures. It is a hope of new medical treatments for different types of chronic pain and diseases. These include spinal cord injury, diabetes, myocardial infarction, and Parkinson’s disease.
However, HSC (human stem cell) study also raises some political and ethical criticisms. The ethical concerns have made this potentially beneficial therapy quite controversial in California.
Let’s dig down and determine the key factors that make this healing therapy or treatment a hot topic.
What Makes Stem Cell Therapy Controversial in California
Voters have recently approved prop 14 in California to pump millions of dollars into the state’s stem cell research program. The voting bills allow the Californian state to spend over $5.5 billion on the CIRM and stem cell agencies. Therefore, the state can enable stem cell institutes to expand the research programs and create new facilities.
What is stem cell therapy?
Unlike specialized body cells such as bone or blood cells, stem cells don’t have any specific job. They are more like the raw material of your body. They divide and can make or renew stem cells. They may also turn into many types of specialized cells.
Stem cell clinic in Beverly Hills offers people safe and non-invasive cell therapy. They specifically alleviate symptoms of bone disorders and stimulate the anti-aging process. The promising and best anti-aging therapy Beverly Hills allows people to get rid of premature aging signs.
Controverter around Stem Cells
Despite making stirring headlines, studies on stem cells are still in their early stages. Researchers have adapted treatments that worked in several animal-based trials. The treatments include blindness, macular degeneration, spinal cord injuries, stroke, and Lou Gehrig’s disease.
Bone marrow transplant is a common type of stem cell therapy. Doctors specifically use it to treat blood cancer. The therapy also offers promising results for grafts of corneal cells and skin grafts for burnt victims.
The stem cell controversy in California largely lies in its use of cells sourced from the embryo. Stem cell experts take these cells from embryos when they are in their early stages of development.
While opponents of stem cell therapy link this to abortion, other medical professionals disagree. Note that embryonic stem cells doctors use in research or medical procedures come from different IVF clinics – that fertilize the eggs with sperm but don’t implant it into the patient.
These stem cells perform better than adult stem cells. Medical professionals consider them more useful and beneficial for the treatments.
In conclusion, despite all the controversies surrounding stem cell therapy, it is an excellent medical advancement. Embryonic stem cells have the ability to treat ailments such as Alzheimer’s and diabetes, and other conditions.